
Cash for Clunkers: A government bailout program that will profit the auto industry, trick consumers into buying unreliable cars at the cost of their own tax dollars and slap the poor in the face by robbing them of a vehicle that could improve their living situation.
What is Cash For Clunkers?
The Cash for Clunkers or “CARS” program is a government bailout designed to stimulate the ailing auto industry and promote the environmentalist lifestyle by offering consumers up to a $4,500 rebate on the purchase of a new, eco friendly car. In order to qualify, consumers must trade in their old car, aka the “clunker” for a new car that has better gas mileage. The merits of ethanol and other hybrid fuel sources are highly contraversial. Whether the car is actually environmentally sound (or whether our environment needs this measure of protection) has yet to be proven.
CARS also being called “fleet modernization” and “scrappage” because the old cars are scrapped, stripped for parts and permanently taken off the road in a bloodthirsty cry to save the Earth, and save the auto industry. Which in itself, is contradictory.
Initially, $1 Billion dollars was allotted for this program, which ran out of money faster than it could give it away. The House then voted to approve an additional $2 billion dollars for the program in an effort to save it from “scrappage”, CARS will soon go before the Senate for a final vote.
Who is paying for CARS? You are through your tax dollars.
What Does This Mean For the Poor?
The CARS program is based on a European policy, it does not reflect the needs of the American people. Nor has it been scientifically proven to have a real, environmental benefit. What we do know is that perfectly useable cars are being scrapped–with ads showing the cars tipping out of dumpsters. The cost of scrapping, shipping metal and dumping the cars will likely cause its own environmental impact.
We also know that the American people have a variety of needs, we are in an economic crisis–whose remedy seems to be treated with record levels of government spending. Now the government is setting itself up as a wheel and deal used car salesman with the pitch that this is good for our environment. But is CARS what America really needs? Our tax dollars would be better spent invested in the American people, and in our real life concerns…not used to purchase a luxury item for someone else, who obviously is not struggling if they can buy a car
Poor people, disabled people, single moms, abused women and the elderly could benefit from these unwanted cars. I don’t understand why these vehicles have to be scrapped. What happened to reuse, reduse and recycle?
Here are some likely scenarios:
1) Abused woman (may have children) fleeing her home, the car would provide a means to escape, and a means to survive indepedantly on her own.
2) A family with a handicapped child could use a van or a truck for transportation, and it may be better suited to medical equiptment and additional space needed. A poor family, who cannot afford the high costs of this specialized transportation, would especially benefit.
3) A single parent household could use the transportation for employment, education, groceries and day to day living. Families relying on public transportation are forced to spend hours running simple errands. Many single parent families struggle to get children to and from daycare, relying on public transportation, they may have to cut their work hours. Issues like these create barriers, and make it harder to overcome poverty. A vehicle would be an immense help, and asset to a needy family.
4) A homeless family has finally been offered housing but the housing is in an area with no public transportation or limited public transportation. The unwanted “clunker” would allow the family an opportunity to get off the streets, and get into a better neighborhood.
5) A struggling church or non-profit agency could use the “clunker” to provide transportation or access to community resources, directly meeting the needs of our communities.
For an elderly or disabled person, they would have better access to resources and more opportunities to socialize, and be involved the community because transportation has been provided to servicing agencies.
Is this real? In my experience, YES! In some form of another these scenarios have happened to me.
After I fled my home, my abuser took the family car, and then refused to make payments on it as a form of punishment. My children and I were forced to rely on the bus. In the winters, when temperatures, dropped below zero–in rain storms–in any kind of weather, my children I trekked outside. One winter it was so cold, that when we walked outside, my children screamed and cried as icy winds hit their faces and almost knocked them to the ground. Another time it rained so hard that our clothing was soaking through, and we were left shivering cold. A simple trip to the grocery store could take 2 hours or more. I carried groceries in a backpack, and also loaded up the baby stroller. It was nearly impossible to do laundry. More than once we encountered dangerous situations. Yet we had no other choice.
We were on waiting lists for housing for 2 years before a home was finally offered–in a rural area. We had no other place to live and were forced to accept a home in an area with no bus service. And because I am fleeing domestic violence, I have to remain hidden from my abuser and have to take my children outside my home town for schooling; so I have to provide my own transportation to get my kids to school. Other than a gas station, there is no grocery store for nearly 5 miles. Thank God, a car was donated to us by family members, who saved their money so we would not have to struggle. Our “clunker” has literally saved our lives, and given my children a chance at a better life.
DO NOT SCRAP OR SALVAGE YOUR CLUNKER! DONATE IT TO A CHARITY OR AGENCY THAT WILL HELP POOR PEOPLE!!!!!
I also urge the Senate to vote against this ridiculous bill. Our tax dollars can and should be better spent.
Lynn Mari, © 2009.
Note: CARS ended 8/24/2009, the Obama Administration is planning to start a similiar program involving energy efficient home appliances–another outrage!
Links:
“Cash For Clunkers, Crackpot Economic”, Wall Street Journal, Op Ed. 8/2/2009.
“Clearly, we spoilsports need an attitude adjustment to Washington’s new economics…as long as everyone thinks we can conjure wealth out of $4,500 giveaways, let’s go all the way.’
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204313604574326531645819464.html
“Critics Blast ‘Cash for Clunkers $2 Billion Dollar Lifeline” by Mike Lillis, The Washington Independant. 7/31/09.
http://washingtonindependent.com/53487/critics-blast-cash-for-clunkers-2-billion-lifeline
“Q & A: How the ‘cash-for-clunker’ plan would work” by James R. Healy, USA Today. 6/10/2009
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2009-05-11-chrysler-gm-cash-clunkers_N.htm
“Success Threatens to Sink ‘Cash For Clunkers’ Program. Fox News Chad Pergram and AP. 7/30/2009
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/30/officials-say-government-set-suspend-cash-clunkers-program